From b51965dddbed68f23c5e8c169c23c794313ce5f6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Boris Kolpackov Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 17:17:23 +0200 Subject: Add boost subset as an implementation detail --- cutl/details/boost/config/compiler/intel.hpp | 234 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 234 insertions(+) create mode 100644 cutl/details/boost/config/compiler/intel.hpp (limited to 'cutl/details/boost/config/compiler/intel.hpp') diff --git a/cutl/details/boost/config/compiler/intel.hpp b/cutl/details/boost/config/compiler/intel.hpp new file mode 100644 index 0000000..7c22118 --- /dev/null +++ b/cutl/details/boost/config/compiler/intel.hpp @@ -0,0 +1,234 @@ +// (C) Copyright John Maddock 2001-8. +// (C) Copyright Peter Dimov 2001. +// (C) Copyright Jens Maurer 2001. +// (C) Copyright David Abrahams 2002 - 2003. +// (C) Copyright Aleksey Gurtovoy 2002 - 2003. +// (C) Copyright Guillaume Melquiond 2002 - 2003. +// (C) Copyright Beman Dawes 2003. +// (C) Copyright Martin Wille 2003. +// Use, modification and distribution are subject to the +// Boost Software License, Version 1.0. (See accompanying file +// LICENSE_1_0.txt or copy at http://www.boost.org/LICENSE_1_0.txt) + +// See http://www.boost.org for most recent version. + +// Intel compiler setup: + +#include "cutl/details/boost/config/compiler/common_edg.hpp" + +#if defined(__INTEL_COMPILER) +# define BOOST_INTEL_CXX_VERSION __INTEL_COMPILER +#elif defined(__ICL) +# define BOOST_INTEL_CXX_VERSION __ICL +#elif defined(__ICC) +# define BOOST_INTEL_CXX_VERSION __ICC +#elif defined(__ECC) +# define BOOST_INTEL_CXX_VERSION __ECC +#endif + +// Flags determined by comparing output of 'icpc -dM -E' with and without '-std=c++0x' +#if (!(defined(_WIN32) || defined(_WIN64)) && defined(__STDC_HOSTED__) && __STDC_HOSTED__) || defined(__GXX_EXPERIMENTAL_CPP0X__) +# define BOOST_INTEL_STDCXX0X +#endif +#if defined(_MSC_VER) && (_MSC_VER >= 1600) +# define BOOST_INTEL_STDCXX0X +#endif + +#ifdef BOOST_INTEL_STDCXX0X +#define BOOST_COMPILER "Intel C++ C++0x mode version " BOOST_STRINGIZE(BOOST_INTEL_CXX_VERSION) +#else +#define BOOST_COMPILER "Intel C++ version " BOOST_STRINGIZE(BOOST_INTEL_CXX_VERSION) +#endif +#define BOOST_INTEL BOOST_INTEL_CXX_VERSION + +#if defined(_WIN32) || defined(_WIN64) +# define BOOST_INTEL_WIN BOOST_INTEL +#else +# define BOOST_INTEL_LINUX BOOST_INTEL +#endif + +#if (BOOST_INTEL_CXX_VERSION <= 500) && defined(_MSC_VER) +# define BOOST_NO_EXPLICIT_FUNCTION_TEMPLATE_ARGUMENTS +# define BOOST_NO_TEMPLATE_TEMPLATES +#endif + +#if (BOOST_INTEL_CXX_VERSION <= 600) + +# if defined(_MSC_VER) && (_MSC_VER <= 1300) // added check for <= VC 7 (Peter Dimov) + +// Boost libraries assume strong standard conformance unless otherwise +// indicated by a config macro. As configured by Intel, the EDG front-end +// requires certain compiler options be set to achieve that strong conformance. +// Particularly /Qoption,c,--arg_dep_lookup (reported by Kirk Klobe & Thomas Witt) +// and /Zc:wchar_t,forScope. See boost-root/tools/build/intel-win32-tools.jam for +// details as they apply to particular versions of the compiler. When the +// compiler does not predefine a macro indicating if an option has been set, +// this config file simply assumes the option has been set. +// Thus BOOST_NO_ARGUMENT_DEPENDENT_LOOKUP will not be defined, even if +// the compiler option is not enabled. + +# define BOOST_NO_SWPRINTF +# endif + +// Void returns, 64 bit integrals don't work when emulating VC 6 (Peter Dimov) + +# if defined(_MSC_VER) && (_MSC_VER <= 1200) +# define BOOST_NO_VOID_RETURNS +# define BOOST_NO_INTEGRAL_INT64_T +# endif + +#endif + +#if (BOOST_INTEL_CXX_VERSION <= 710) && defined(_WIN32) +# define BOOST_NO_POINTER_TO_MEMBER_TEMPLATE_PARAMETERS +#endif + +// See http://aspn.activestate.com/ASPN/Mail/Message/boost/1614864 +#if BOOST_INTEL_CXX_VERSION < 600 +# define BOOST_NO_INTRINSIC_WCHAR_T +#else +// We should test the macro _WCHAR_T_DEFINED to check if the compiler +// supports wchar_t natively. *BUT* there is a problem here: the standard +// headers define this macro if they typedef wchar_t. Anyway, we're lucky +// because they define it without a value, while Intel C++ defines it +// to 1. So we can check its value to see if the macro was defined natively +// or not. +// Under UNIX, the situation is exactly the same, but the macro _WCHAR_T +// is used instead. +# if ((_WCHAR_T_DEFINED + 0) == 0) && ((_WCHAR_T + 0) == 0) +# define BOOST_NO_INTRINSIC_WCHAR_T +# endif +#endif + +#if defined(__GNUC__) && !defined(BOOST_FUNCTION_SCOPE_USING_DECLARATION_BREAKS_ADL) +// +// Figure out when Intel is emulating this gcc bug +// (All Intel versions prior to 9.0.26, and versions +// later than that if they are set up to emulate gcc 3.2 +// or earlier): +// +# if ((__GNUC__ == 3) && (__GNUC_MINOR__ <= 2)) || (BOOST_INTEL < 900) || (__INTEL_COMPILER_BUILD_DATE < 20050912) +# define BOOST_FUNCTION_SCOPE_USING_DECLARATION_BREAKS_ADL +# endif +#endif +#if (defined(__GNUC__) && (__GNUC__ < 4)) || defined(_WIN32) || (BOOST_INTEL_CXX_VERSION <= 1200) +// GCC or VC emulation: +#define BOOST_NO_TWO_PHASE_NAME_LOOKUP +#endif +// +// Verify that we have actually got BOOST_NO_INTRINSIC_WCHAR_T +// set correctly, if we don't do this now, we will get errors later +// in type_traits code among other things, getting this correct +// for the Intel compiler is actually remarkably fragile and tricky: +// +#if defined(BOOST_NO_INTRINSIC_WCHAR_T) +#include +template< typename T > struct assert_no_intrinsic_wchar_t; +template<> struct assert_no_intrinsic_wchar_t { typedef void type; }; +// if you see an error here then you need to unset BOOST_NO_INTRINSIC_WCHAR_T +// where it is defined above: +typedef assert_no_intrinsic_wchar_t::type assert_no_intrinsic_wchar_t_; +#else +template< typename T > struct assert_intrinsic_wchar_t; +template<> struct assert_intrinsic_wchar_t {}; +// if you see an error here then define BOOST_NO_INTRINSIC_WCHAR_T on the command line: +template<> struct assert_intrinsic_wchar_t {}; +#endif + +#if _MSC_VER+0 >= 1000 +# if _MSC_VER >= 1200 +# define BOOST_HAS_MS_INT64 +# endif +# define BOOST_NO_SWPRINTF +# define BOOST_NO_TWO_PHASE_NAME_LOOKUP +#elif defined(_WIN32) +# define BOOST_DISABLE_WIN32 +#endif + +// I checked version 6.0 build 020312Z, it implements the NRVO. +// Correct this as you find out which version of the compiler +// implemented the NRVO first. (Daniel Frey) +#if (BOOST_INTEL_CXX_VERSION >= 600) +# define BOOST_HAS_NRVO +#endif + +// +// versions check: +// we don't support Intel prior to version 5.0: +#if BOOST_INTEL_CXX_VERSION < 500 +# error "Compiler not supported or configured - please reconfigure" +#endif + +// Intel on MacOS requires +#if defined(__APPLE__) && defined(__INTEL_COMPILER) +# define BOOST_NO_TWO_PHASE_NAME_LOOKUP +#endif + +// Intel on Altix Itanium +#if defined(__itanium__) && defined(__INTEL_COMPILER) +# define BOOST_NO_TWO_PHASE_NAME_LOOKUP +#endif + +// +// An attempt to value-initialize a pointer-to-member may trigger an +// internal error on Intel <= 11.1 (last checked version), as was +// reported by John Maddock, Intel support issue 589832, May 2010. +// Moreover, according to test results from Huang-Vista-x86_32_intel, +// intel-vc9-win-11.1 may leave a non-POD array uninitialized, in some +// cases when it should be value-initialized. +// (Niels Dekker, LKEB, May 2010) +#if defined(__INTEL_COMPILER) +# if __INTEL_COMPILER <= 1110 +# define BOOST_NO_COMPLETE_VALUE_INITIALIZATION +# endif +#endif + +// +// Dynamic shared object (DSO) and dynamic-link library (DLL) support +// +#if defined(__GNUC__) && (__GNUC__ >= 4) +# define BOOST_SYMBOL_EXPORT __attribute__((visibility("default"))) +# define BOOST_SYMBOL_IMPORT +# define BOOST_SYMBOL_VISIBLE __attribute__((visibility("default"))) +#endif +// +// C++0x features +// - ICC added static_assert in 11.0 (first version with C++0x support) +// +#if defined(BOOST_INTEL_STDCXX0X) +# undef BOOST_NO_STATIC_ASSERT +// +// These pass our test cases, but aren't officially supported according to: +// http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/c0x-features-supported-by-intel-c-compiler/ +// +//# undef BOOST_NO_LAMBDAS +//# undef BOOST_NO_DECLTYPE +//# undef BOOST_NO_AUTO_DECLARATIONS +//# undef BOOST_NO_AUTO_MULTIDECLARATIONS +#endif + +#if defined(BOOST_INTEL_STDCXX0X) && (BOOST_INTEL_CXX_VERSION >= 1200) +# undef BOOST_NO_RVALUE_REFERENCES +# undef BOOST_NO_SCOPED_ENUMS +# undef BOOST_NO_DELETED_FUNCTIONS +# undef BOOST_NO_DEFAULTED_FUNCTIONS +# undef BOOST_NO_LAMBDAS +# undef BOOST_NO_DECLTYPE +# undef BOOST_NO_AUTO_DECLARATIONS +# undef BOOST_NO_AUTO_MULTIDECLARATIONS +#endif + +// +// last known and checked version: +#if (BOOST_INTEL_CXX_VERSION > 1110) +# if defined(BOOST_ASSERT_CONFIG) +# error "Unknown compiler version - please run the configure tests and report the results" +# elif defined(_MSC_VER) +// +// We don't emit this warning any more, since we have so few +// defect macros set anyway (just the one). +// +//# pragma message("Unknown compiler version - please run the configure tests and report the results") +# endif +#endif + -- cgit v1.1